Bank Regulation Changes: Does It Change Anything?
By Capitalists@Work on June 15, 2009 | More Posts By Capitalists@Work | Author's Website
Over the weekend the first leaks of what changes to financial regulation seeped out of Washington and London. Peston has the highlights and his take on it here.
What is missing though is anything either exciting or bold. It is firmly in the let’s tweak things a bit and hope it never happens again bit.
There is for example no core consideration of preventing banks from becoming too big to fail. This was the biggest issue in the crisis. AIG (AIG), a non-bank but still a big trader, has cost the US Treasury over $100 billion, which will never be seen again. Indeed much of that money seems to have come the way of Barclays (BCS) and RBS (RBS) banks.
So no big knife to cut up the industry, little comment on the need for any accounting changes or thoughts about what may cause the trip up next time.
What does this tell us? That in their hearts, the US and UK Government know that they were the prime cause of the crisis with low interest rates and large money supplies warping the system. If they did not think this, the changes put forward would be more radical.
US Unemployment Rate Troubling, But …
S&P 500: Market Is Strong, But Correction Should Continue
Doctor Up Your Portfolio With This Medical Communications Company
Cartoon: It’s Still The Economy, Stupid
Dendreon Corp.: Put This Promising Biotech Stock On Your Watch List
Macedonia’s Jan.-Sept. Trade Deficit At US$1.61 Bln - 1 day ago
Natural Gas Prices Extend Two-Month Low - 1 day ago
Stocks Finish Modestly Higher Despite Weak Jobs Report - U.S. Commentary - 1 day ago
Treasury Economist: Unemployment Numbers Disappointing But Not Unexpected - 1 day ago
Consumer Credit Fell By $14.8 Bln In September - 1 day ago


