No Government Target For The British Pound
By Capitalists@Work on January 3, 2009 | More Posts By Capitalists@Work | Author's Website
“Sunny Jim” Callaghan must be spinning in his armchair. After a long struggle with Harold Wilson, who refused to even discuss the matter, Callaghan was forced to devalue the pound in November 1967. The devaluation of the pound ended his time as Chancellor of the Exchequer. He went on to make matters worse elsewhere, especially in Northern Ireland and with the Trades Union reforms that never materialised. And he had to get the IMF to bail out the country too. Forced to hold an election after losing a vote of no confidence in his Premiership in 1978, he lost heavily to Margaret Thatcher.
So poor old Jim must be fuming that the sterling crisis that began his ruin has become such a non story. His cut of around 14% forced him from his office. Today the pound is already below the Euro {£0.99} at any bureau de change, and has lost around 25% of value, yet it seems few seem to mind. Least of all the government who don’t even acknowledge that the weakness of sterling is in any way a bad thing.
Yvette Cooper said “We’ve never had a policy of targeting the pound. Our policy is to target inflation. And that I think has been the right one.” David Cameron agreed.
No doubt the strategy is a bit Fawlty Towers, “Don’t mention the Euro.” Then options remain open, unlike ‘Big Jim’ who had promised no devaluation. Defending the currency would be near impossible anyway.
What other options there are is unclear. What could happen when the next interest rate cut is announced?
This is the sale advert of a major furniture retailer in the newspaper. It is 1/4 page on the front and a full colour, full page, on the back.
Massive Savings
beat the $ price rise
As well as our legendary claim to be “the best prices in the UK” by forward buying certain ranges, for a short while, we can “beat the significant rise” following the currency fluctuations.
BUT ONLY WHILE STOCKS LAST!
Whatever the wisdom of this sales campaign I have never seen a January sale advert that says “buy it now because it will be more expensive later.”
We will all see much more of this sort of thing in the new year.
Will a public, who are enjoying a level of price cuts not seen for years, be tempted into the spending our way out of debt policy, when prices not only revert to their pre-sale levels, but actually increase?
As James Callaghan himself said:
“We used to think that you could spend your way out of a recession, and increase employment by cutting taxes and boosting Government spending. I tell you in all candour that that option no longer exists”
One Reason Why The US Dollar Might Rise
Ron Paul Thinks That Fed “Oversight Is Laughable”
S&P 500 Index Is Still Overvalued
This Small Oil Exploration Company Is Ripe For A Takeover… Here’s How To Profit
Obama Commits To Free Trade Agreement With South Korea, But Auto Trade Remains An Obstacle
Bay Street Stocks Slip Slightly Again - Canadian Commentary - 1 day ago
Stocks Close Mostly Lower Amid Disappointing Quarterly Results - U.S. Commentary - 1 day ago
Bay Street Stocks Linger Slightly Below Unchanged Level - Canadian Commentary - 1 day ago
Stocks Remain Stuck In The Red In Mid-Afternoon Trading - U.S Commentary - 1 day ago
European Markets Fall, Led By Banks, Oils - European Commentary - 1 day ago


