New York  London  GMT  Tokyo  Singapore 

No Government Target For The British Pound

By Capitalists@Work on January 3, 2009 | More Posts By Capitalists@Work | Author's Website

“Sunny Jim” Callaghan must be spinning in his armchair. After a long struggle with Harold Wilson, who refused to even discuss the matter, Callaghan was forced to devalue the pound in November 1967. The devaluation of the pound ended his time as Chancellor of the Exchequer. He went on to make matters worse elsewhere, especially in Northern Ireland and with the Trades Union reforms that never materialised. And he had to get the IMF to bail out the country too. Forced to hold an election after losing a vote of no confidence in his Premiership in 1978, he lost heavily to Margaret Thatcher.

So poor old Jim must be fuming that the sterling crisis that began his ruin has become such a non story. His cut of around 14% forced him from his office. Today the pound is already below the Euro {£0.99} at any bureau de change, and has lost around 25% of value, yet it seems few seem to mind. Least of all the government who don’t even acknowledge that the weakness of sterling is in any way a bad thing.

Yvette Cooper said “We’ve never had a policy of targeting the pound. Our policy is to target inflation. And that I think has been the right one.” David Cameron agreed.

No doubt the strategy is a bit Fawlty Towers, “Don’t mention the Euro.” Then options remain open, unlike ‘Big Jim’ who had promised no devaluation. Defending the currency would be near impossible anyway.
What other options there are is unclear. What could happen when the next interest rate cut is announced?

This is the sale advert of a major furniture retailer in the newspaper. It is 1/4 page on the front and a full colour, full page, on the back.

Massive Savings
beat the $ price rise
As well as our legendary claim to be “the best prices in the UK” by forward buying certain ranges, for a short while, we can “beat the significant rise” following the currency fluctuations.
BUT ONLY WHILE STOCKS LAST!

Whatever the wisdom of this sales campaign I have never seen a January sale advert that says “buy it now because it will be more expensive later.”

We will all see much more of this sort of thing in the new year.

Will a public, who are enjoying a level of price cuts not seen for years, be tempted into the spending our way out of debt policy, when prices not only revert to their pre-sale levels, but actually increase?

As James Callaghan himself said:

“We used to think that you could spend your way out of a recession, and increase employment by cutting taxes and boosting Government spending. I tell you in all candour that that option no longer exists”

If you like this article please...
Subscribe by RSS Subscribe by Email Email This Post To A Friend Email This Post To A Friend

Leave A Comment :

Name (required)
E-mail (required - never shown publicly)
URI
Subscribe to comments via email
Your Comment (smaller size | larger size)
You may use <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> in your comment.
Opinions From Our Contributors
Commodities Financials Exchange Traded Funds
Stocks Forex Economy



Theme By: WordPress Theme Shop