The Unemployment Rate And State And Local Economic Policy

My friends are telling me I’m an idiot.  I was quoted in the local newspaper last week saying that our high unemployment rate was a bit of a mystery.  Both friends and strangers have told me that it’s simple: our state has high unemployment because of bad policy, such as high tax rates and restrictive controls on growth.  Here’s why they are wrong and I am right.

Unemployment is a labor market phenomenon, not a general economic phenomenon.  Weak demand for labor may arise from bad policy.  “Businesses won’t create jobs if they are taxed too high” is the common theme.  But labor demand is not based solely on public policy.  The number of workers that a business will hire depends also on how much those workers need to be paid.  I would expect poor public policy to lead to weak demand for labor, and thus low wage rates rather than high unemployment.

The price system usually brings supply and demand into balance.

Nobody wants to sit in the middle seat of an airplane on a long trip, but those middle seats are pretty much full.  Why?  The airlines set prices so that the seats sell.  Or consider gasoline.  People drive fewer miles in the winter than in the summer, but we don’t see unemployed gasoline in January.  Instead, we see (on average) lower gas prices in winter than in summer.  When we have unemployment, we ask, “Why doesn’t the wage rate drop to keep all of the people employed?”

There are both long-run issues and short-run issues.  In the long run, there’s a natural level of unemployment that reflects the time it takes for a person to find work.  We have new people coming into the labor force, as well as people quitting and being dismissed, and most of these people would rather take some time looking for a good job than accepting the first job opening they come across.  This natural unemployment rate is higher in states that have a great deal of in-migration (such as Oregon), because the newcomers need time to find jobs.  While they are looking, they are unemployed.

The minimum wage prevents price adjustment for low-skilled workers, so states with higher minimum wage rates experience higher unemployment rates, especially for youth and minorities.  This is an instance where state policy does come into play.

In the short run, recessions bring high unemployment because wage rates are slow to adjust to weak demand, for a wide variety of reasons.  The extent of unemployment in the recession depends on how the state or local area is impacted by the recession.  Those places (such as Oregon) with a greater concentration in manufacturing and construction have a bigger change in labor demand and thus a greater rise in unemployment.

However, aside from the minimum wage, bad long-term public policy does not explain a higher unemployment rate.  It could explain lower wage rates in general, though.

Subscribe by RSS Subscribe by Email

Comment by VicinSea

2009-06-01 09:47:59

So by your system, lower minimum wage leads to higher employment–so how low does it need to go? In countries that practice SLAVERY, unemployment among the slaves is very low! Are you suggesting that we create more wage-slaves in the US?

I suggest the opposite is true–basic prices need to be raised enough to pay each worker a living wage with health insurance. If McDonald’s raised their prices 50 cents per average order, all of their employees could be paid better and provided with benefits. If Walmart increased their prices 2% on everything, they could offer full time employment to all their workers instead of keeping everyone on part-time(no benefits) hours.

Stop the current, shortsighted, system of “cheaper is better” and start promoting the companies that treat their workers like human beings instead of animals.

Reply to this comment

 

Comment by jacob

2009-06-01 14:37:25

“basic prices need to be raised enough to pay each worker a living wage with health insurance”
HA! You never heard the things that Hoover tried to do then, I take it.

Besides, if workers don’t have a living wage right now, how are price increases going to help that? Then they have to pay more out of their non-living wage. Make it harder to purchase goods so that it is easier to purchase goods? I don’t follow the logic.

Stop trying to repeal laws of economics by decree, it can’t be done.

Reply to this comment