What About Adjusting Employment Reports For Population?
By Mark Perry on May 7, 2009 | More Posts By Mark Perry | Author's Website
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Labor Department reported Thursday that the number newly laid off workers applying for benefits dropped to 601,000 last week. That was far better than the rise to 635,000 claims that economists expected. But the total number of people receiving jobless benefits climbed to 6.35 million, a 14th straight record.
MP: There’s one small problem with the bold statement above: The population of the U.S. has roughly doubled since the 1950s, so comparisons of today’s unemployed (unadjusted) to past periods is meaningless without adjusting for the population. The chart above shows that the current number of unemployed (6.2 million average for April) is about 2% of the current U.S. population (estimated 306.56 million for April), which is still below the 2.12% level in 1975. So the claim of a 14th straight record for Americans receiving jobless benefits is not accurate, after adjusting for the size of the U.S. population.
US Commercial Property Sector: A Tsunami Of Red Ink
Interesting Articles To Read
US Dollar Tops, While Precious Metal Stocks Bottom: There’s More To Seasonality Than Summer Doldrums
Weak U.S. Economy May Not Mean Weak Dollar This Time
Month To Date Market Review
China Stocks Poised To Add To Gains - 3 mins ago
Australia Home Loans +5.1% On Month In September - 14 mins ago
Flat Open Seen For Taiwan Shares - 30 mins ago
Australia Job Ads -1.7% On Month In October - 31 mins ago
*Australia September Housing Loans +4.8% By Value - 42 mins ago



