What About Adjusting Employment Reports For Population?
By Mark Perry on May 7, 2009 | More Posts By Mark Perry | Author's Website
WASHINGTON (AP) — The Labor Department reported Thursday that the number newly laid off workers applying for benefits dropped to 601,000 last week. That was far better than the rise to 635,000 claims that economists expected. But the total number of people receiving jobless benefits climbed to 6.35 million, a 14th straight record.
MP: There’s one small problem with the bold statement above: The population of the U.S. has roughly doubled since the 1950s, so comparisons of today’s unemployed (unadjusted) to past periods is meaningless without adjusting for the population. The chart above shows that the current number of unemployed (6.2 million average for April) is about 2% of the current U.S. population (estimated 306.56 million for April), which is still below the 2.12% level in 1975. So the claim of a 14th straight record for Americans receiving jobless benefits is not accurate, after adjusting for the size of the U.S. population.
Forex Wrap-up: A Massive Short-Covering Rally In The US Dollar May Just Be Starting
The Message Of The 2-Year US Treasury Note, Deflation And Japan
Video: The Week Ahead
3 Steps To Becoming A More Successful Trader
The Transportation Sector: Here Are Three Investments In A Sector That Are Ready To Soar
Bay Street Stocks Slip Slightly Again - Canadian Commentary - 22 hrs ago
Stocks Close Mostly Lower Amid Disappointing Quarterly Results - U.S. Commentary - 22 hrs ago
Bay Street Stocks Linger Slightly Below Unchanged Level - Canadian Commentary - 23 hrs ago
Stocks Remain Stuck In The Red In Mid-Afternoon Trading - U.S Commentary - 1 day ago
European Markets Fall, Led By Banks, Oils - European Commentary - 1 day ago



