Obama Printing Money To Jumpstart US Economy – Will It Help?
For a few fleeting, horrifying moments this past week the fault lines that underlie the global economic crisis erupted into plain view. With deft and quick effort leaders in Washington, Europe and Asia papered over the fissures and fears largely subsided. But the shock of plain truths which resulted in violent currency movements are the latest reminder that the 21st century economic order will bear little resemblance to the world we now know.
The tremors began in Beijing, where a essay from the governor of the People’s Bank of China seemed to favor the creation of an IMF currency to replace the U.S. dollar as the world’s reserve. In Europe, the rotating president of the European Union, outgoing Czech Prime Minister Mirek Topolanek, characterized America’s plan to combat the widening global recession as the “road to hell.” At same time, British Member of the European Parliament Daniel Hannan made headlines the world over with his stinging rebuke of the inflationary and debt-focused policies of the current UK government.
As a result of these clearly voiced frustrations, the U.S. dollar suffered a drubbing. However, Treasury secretary Geithner and his ministerial counterparts in Berlin, Paris and London did their best to convince everyone that the world is pulling together as one to combat the economic crisis. The charm offensive was effective in restoring calm.
Given the size and scope of the remedies that the Obama Administration is cajoling the world to adopt, it is likely that the unease will grow until many countries emerge in open revolt to America’s plans.
President Obama and the majority of our leadership on both sides of the aisle are confident that the right mix of monetary and fiscal policy can restart the spending party that defined America for a generation. And as the bleary-eyed revelers wisely reach for a cup of black coffee or stumble into a rehab center, Obama is pouring grain alcohol into the punch bowl hoping to lure the walking zombies back onto the dance floor. Europe and Asia fully understand that Obama will ask them to lend the booze.
Washington is telling us that our problems result from a lack of consumer spending. Therefore, the solution is for government spending to pick up the slack. However, if Americans are too broke to spend, then how can our government spend for us? The only money they have is taken from us through taxation. To postpone immediate tax hikes (adding interest for good measure), Washington plans to borrow more from abroad. However, if our foreign creditors refuse to pony up, much of the money will simply be printed instead.
Printing money is merely taxation in another form. Rather than robbing citizens of their money, government robs their money of its purchasing power. Many people assume that if government provides the funds we can spend our way back to prosperity. However, it’s not money we lack but production. If the government simply prints money and doles it out, we will not be able to buy more stuff; we will simply pay higher prices. The only way to buy more is to produce more. It is production that creates purchasing power, not the printing press!
Our current predicament resulted in part from our efforts to maintain consumer spending at unsustainable levels, primarily by the reckless extension of consumer credit. Pushing up consumer credit to levels not supported by market realities required government subsidies and guarantees. In addition, Wall Street pitched in with securitization and credit default swaps, which created a false sense of confidence among our creditors that high risk consumer loans could actually be repaid. However, now that all those gimmicks have blown up, the entire farce has been exposed. There is simply no way to sustain an economy based on consumer credit.
The Administration argues that more debt will restore growth which will then allow the repayment of borrowed money. First, our government has never, and will never, repay anything. Second, the assumption that additional borrowing and spending will restore growth is flawed. In fact, more consumer debt and government spending will undermine our economy and restrain growth.
To solve our problems we must first come to terms with their source. That is what the voices from abroad are telling us. We borrowed and spent ourselves to the brink of bankruptcy, and now we must save and produce ourselves back to prosperity.
Of course, this simple solution is rejected by Keynesian economists who insist that we must keep spending. The “paradox of thrift,” as they call it, holds that if we stop spending the recession will worsen. While this is true, it is hardly a paradox. As they say in the fitness game, “no pain, no gain.” No one said this was going to be easy, but the only way to rebuild a viable economy is to let the phony one collapse. If we follow the Keynesians, the fault lines will continue to widen until our wealth, our lifestyle, our very ability to prosper is swallowed up. The calls from abroad will only get louder until we face this ugly truth.

Absolutely right.
Couldn’t agree more.
Lol while the Yanks control the oil, they can basically print as much money as they want, regardless of whatever China or Europe does… both of which are also debt ridden to hell (don’t believe all the crap about China ‘surging ahead’ they’re in one hell of a mess)…
Look out for the China bubble popping within the next few years.
Absolutely wrong. And written like someone who hasn’t taken more than a couple of econ classes.
Are you really proposing that we let the economy crash so that we can hit the reset button? Was it that much fun in the 30s that you want to do it again?
The economy is not a computer, there is no reset. When it crashes, it crashes hard, for a long time, and it is very difficult to restart.
You argue we need to “save and produce ourselves back to prosperity.” But when people save, en masse, the spending drops. That means demand drops, that means supply drops. When supply drops, jobs are lost. Lots of them. Lost jobs mean ‘so much for producing ourselves back to prosperity’. In fact, production drops drastically. People, newly unemployed, cut spending even further, contributing to a snowball effect. Producers don’t invest in new factories or businesses because of the low demand, and fear of losing the investment. Now, confidence suffers, and people are even less willing to take financial risks.
Nope, my man, the time for nations to make the tough fiscal decisions (which you correctly note MUST be made sometime) is when the going is good. Not when the going is tough. Sadly, we’ll all agree that the tough decisions also don’t get made when the going is good, but that’s the real problem.
For now, we need to keep the economy from tanking. All the teabaggers who think times are terrible have no idea how bad it would be if their ideas won. If we don’t spend and keep the wheels turning, we’ll be riding in boxcars, lighting fires in barrels, and walking around with our clothes tied on a stick. Good times…
moil4gold49
Prinitng more money without gold to back it would cause the money we have to lessen the valued of the American dollar.
That isn’t a smart idea whatsoever. It will weaken our system more.