GSE Excess: Privatizing Profits, Socializing Losses

From the Executive Summary of The Cato Institute’s Briefing Paper “Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae: An Exit Strategy for the Taxpayer,” by economist/blogger Arnold Kling:

The Fannie Mae-Freddie Mac crisis may have been the most avoidable financial crisis in history. Economists have long complained that the risks posed by the government-sponsored enterprises were large relative to any social benefits.

We now realize that the overall policy of promoting home ownership was carried to excess. Even taking as given the goal of expanding home ownership, the public policy case for subsidizing mortgage finance was weak. The case for using the GSEs as a vehicle to subsidize mortgage finance was weaker still. The GSE structure serves to privatize profits and socialize losses. And even if one thought that home ownership was worth encouraging, mortgage debt was worth subsidizing, and the GSE structure was viable, allowing the GSEs to assume a dominant role in mortgage finance was a mistake. The larger they grew, the more precarious our financial markets became.

MP: I think the sentence in bold above says it all.

Posted in Categories: Contributor, Economy, External Research.

Subscribe by RSS Subscribe by Email