Inflation With No Growth In Money Supply For 3 Years In A Row?
By Mark Perry on June 10, 2008 | More Posts By Mark Perry | Author's Website
There’s been a lot of talk and discussion recently about inflation and fears of future inflation, but not a lot of focus on the main and necessary ingredient for inflation: the supply of money.
The top chart above shows that the growth in M1 has been close to 0% for about the last 30 months, since early 2006 (percent change from a year ago). The bottom chart shows M1 growth for the last 50 years.
Bottom Line: Maybe I am missing something, or maybe inflation is no longer a “monetary phenomenon,” but if we do have rising inflation in 2008, it would be the first time in at least half a century, and maybe ever, that we had problems with inflation accompanied by NO growth in M1 for three years in a row.
If you like this article please...
2 Comments :
Recent Market Opinions:
Month To Date Market Review
Stock Picks For Monday: Citigroup, JDS Uniphase And General Electric
US Unemployment Rate Troubling, But …
S&P 500: Market Is Strong, But Correction Should Continue
Doctor Up Your Portfolio With This Medical Communications Company
Recent News:
Macedonia’s Jan.-Sept. Trade Deficit At US$1.61 Bln - 1 day ago
Natural Gas Prices Extend Two-Month Low - 1 day ago
Stocks Finish Modestly Higher Despite Weak Jobs Report - U.S. Commentary - 1 day ago
Treasury Economist: Unemployment Numbers Disappointing But Not Unexpected - 1 day ago
Consumer Credit Fell By $14.8 Bln In September - 1 day ago
Opinions From Our Contributors





Does M1 include dollars held offshore? If not, the value of M1 will be increased dramatically when offshore dollars are “repatriated” through the buy out of domestic assets by foreign investors. The resulting price inflation with the “repatriated” dollars being spent domestically will be severe.
If M1 accurately includes all offshore dollars, then the current inflation prospects are quite mild. A rather prolonged recession becomes more likely rather than stagflation, which has been envisioned by some recently. The bottom line in this case is a reduced standard of living for the American populace because increased demand in the rest of the world will produce continuing inflation in dollar terms (further dollar devaluation).
Either scenario can be mitigated in the long run if American political and economic will focuses on how to increase U.S. productivity. One means of dramatically increasing U.S. productivity would be in the area of implementation of non-polluting energy technology on a large scale. An ever increasing amount of our resources are literally “going up in smoke”. Reducing this waste (not to mention the global polution), could be the salvation of the American economy after the next 5-10 years. Yes, those 5-10 years will be somewhat austere. They will also be austere if there is no energy revolution. The difference is that with the energy technolgy revolution, great expansion of American prosperity is revived in future years. Not taking action extends the austerity and decline many years into the future.
There are many areas of American life that need good public policy decisions: health care, education, etc. Addressing any or all of these will be compromised if enrgy policy is ignored.
It could be that M2 is overtaking M1 which tracks liquid money.